Boldane
All posts

July 7, 2026 · by Oleg Melnikov

How does the LinkedIn algorithm work?

How does the LinkedIn algorithm work? Most answers are a list of tricks. Post at 9am. Use three hashtags. Nobody tells you why the feed behaves the way it does. The why is simple: money. Follow the money and every strange thing about LinkedIn starts making sense.

Why does LinkedIn show you what it shows you?

LinkedIn belongs to Microsoft, and Microsoft is not sentimental about it. The annual report says it plainly: LinkedIn’s growth depends on member engagement. The chain is short.

More users
More logins
Longer scrolls
More money
Microsoft, annual report

“Growth will depend on our ability to increase LinkedIn member engagement on the platform.”

So LinkedIn has exactly one job: build a feed so good you keep scrolling. Every algorithm decision serves that job. Keep this one idea in mind and the rest of this post is almost obvious.

How did the algorithm change?

For years the feed was network-based. You posted, your connections saw it, and if they engaged, their connections saw it too. That system was easy to game. Engagement pods, follower counts, and recycled viral hooks filled the feed with junk, and junk does not keep people scrolling.

So LinkedIn rebuilt it. In 2025 the company published the paper on its new ranking model, a 150 billion parameter AI called 360Brew. The new feed does not care much about who you know. It reads what you write, understands what it is about, and shows it to people who care about that topic. A “For You” page, in a suit.

The old feed · until ~2023
Who you knowLikes decide reachBig followings win
The new feed · now
Who cares about your topicReading time decidesSmall accounts can win

What happens after you hit post?

Every post runs the same gauntlet. Understand it once and you stop blaming the wrong things.

You publish
The clock starts.
Quality check
Spam and engagement bait get filtered before anyone sees them.
A small test group
The post goes out to a sample of people first.
Signals get measured
Did people stop and read? Did they comment? Reading time beats likes.
Topic match
If the test goes well, the feed shows it to strangers who care about your topic. This is where real reach comes from.

Notice what is missing from that journey: your follower count. It matters far less than it used to, and I can prove it.

Can a small account still get reach?

This is the part most founders do not believe, so here are my own numbers.

4,417
followers
582,858
impressions in 365 days
130x+
impressions vs followers
Oleg Melnikov's LinkedIn profile showing 4,417 followers
The follower count.
LinkedIn content performance chart showing 582,858 impressions in the past 365 days, up 2,117%
The reach: 582,858 impressions, up 2,117% on the year before.
My own account, screenshots from July 2026.

About 4,400 followers. 582,858 impressions in a year, over 130 times my follower count. Not because I am special. Because the new feed rents you an audience, one good post at a time. Ten years ago you needed to build the audience first. Now you need to be worth matching. Our clients see the same pattern.

What kind of posts win now?

Here is what I see with clients every week. When someone’s reach is dead, it is almost never the posting time or the hashtags. It is that the posts are generic.

Vague advice used to work. In 2022, maybe 2023, you could post “consistency is key” and grow. Then ChatGPT and Claude made generic content free, and now there is an infinite supply of it. Even when the advice is good, nobody stops on it.

Oleg Melnikov
Oleg Melnikov
Founder, Boldane

“What wins is something that comes directly from you, something nobody else can say. Specific numbers, specific stories, specific characters, specific hot takes. That stands out. And that wins reach.”

You, the founder
Just now

Excited to share some lessons from a recent client project. We improved their processes and the results were amazing. Consistency and hard work always pay off. Agree?

ReachSounds like everyone
You, the founder
Just now

A printing company in Austin. $12M a year. Their line kept stalling at one approval step, so orders sat for days. We cut the step. Shipping time dropped by half. The lesson cost them years: your bottleneck is usually a person, not a machine.

ReachOnly you could write this
The Austin company is an invented example to show the pattern. The details do the work: a place, a number, a bottleneck you can picture.
Real numbersReal placesReal charactersReal storiesReal hot takes

Specifics are the last thing that cannot be copied. A real number. A real place. A real person. A real opinion that costs you something. Finding those details is work: you have to use your brain and your memory instead of asking a chatbot. That is exactly why it stands out, and the feed measures the difference in seconds of attention.

What does the algorithm reward, and why?

Tell a real story with real details
What the feed does
People stop and read. Reading time is the strongest signal.
Why: the money
Longer scrolls, more ads seen.
Stay on your topic
What the feed does
Your post gets matched with people who care about it.
Why: the money
A relevant feed keeps users coming back.
Reply to your comments
What the feed does
The post turns into a conversation and gets shown again.
Why: the money
Conversations keep people on the platform.
Buy likes from an engagement pod
What the feed does
Filtered out. Artificial engagement is dead weight now.
Why: the money
Junk feeds lose users, and users are the product.

What should you do this week?

  • Reread your last five posts. If a competitor could have written them word for word, the feed has nothing to match.
  • Take your most generic draft and add one real number, one real place, one real person. Watch what happens.
  • Not sure what to write at all? Start with the three pillars framework.

The algorithm is not a slot machine. It is a matching machine. It is trying to find the people who need what you know, and it can only match what you actually give it. Give it something specific.